- The Via Negativa states that one can only speak of God in negative terms – God is transcendent so one cannot say what God is, therefore we can only say what he is not
- We can, for example, know that God is not human, God is not evil & God does not have a body
- Via Negativa literally means “the negative way”
- One key idea behind the Via Negativa is that language cannot accurately describe God
- Our language cannot tell people about God as he is beyond human comprehension
- Pseudo-Dionysius suggested that if we talk of God being good, we have to say for example, that God is not good – as we cannot understand what it means to say what he is
- Pseudo-Dionysius stated that God is beyond assertion & beyond denial; “free of every limitation, beyond every limitation“
- Moses Maimonides corroborated this argument, stating that God is beyond any description & to make positive statements describing God is improper & disrespectful
- To describe God in this way limits him to human language & understanding
Analysis of the Via Negativa
Strengths
- Prevents anthropomorphic statements being made about God -the avoidance of positive assertions about God, for example, “God is good” means one avoids limiting God to human terms, as stated by Maimonides
- Supports the view that God is ineffable – too great or extreme to be expressed or described in words as suggested in Jewish tradition
Weaknesses
- Limited understanding – to only speak of God in negative terms gives a very limited understanding of God & his characteristics
- Using negative language does not overcome the problems of using positive language – Maimonides argues that to positively attribute qualities to God is disrespectful & cannot truly describe him – however using the Via Negativa does not overcome this. Saying that God is “not bad” is attributing a characteristic in the same way as saying “God is great”
- Antony Flew – negatives ultimately amount to nothing, we are left with no clear image of what God is